Sunday, January 26, 2014

How do you judge the value of a manuscript where many obvious errors? The purpose of investigating


In this excerpt from a section of a column from the Codex Sinaïtikus I have three lines with red circle that contains exactly site du zero the same letters. In this post we discuss the possibility of an error that can occur when the eye from one part to another "jump". This can cause the part between omitted (haplography) or duplicated (Dittography).
In 1Jn.2: 23 the words "... whom the Son acknowledged, recognized the Father site du zero ..." is omitted from the source from which the Dutch Statenvertaling and 1933/53 African text translated. The KJV reads: "Whoever denies the Son has not the Father." The ANV has the full text: "Who does not recognize the Son reject also the Father who is the Son acknowledged, recognized the Father."
In the King James it in later editions added. This error occurred because the two consecutive sentences with the same words end, viz. "... The Father." This is a clear case maybe of haplography in Erasmus's first printed Greek text.
This type of error is easily recognized and declared. The missing words then from other manuscripts is supplemented. This creates a composite text. Bible Societies rather use a composite text as a single manuscript as source text.
How do you judge the value of a manuscript where many obvious errors? The purpose of investigating any text to the original wording to fix. If there are errors like typos, exchange of letters, or haplography Dittography in a document can be easily identified. The important thing is that the text be there, along with the logic in consideration of obvious errors, we still closer to the document in which it was written off.
The value of a manuscript is not neat or excellence of the particular copier, but getting closer to the source site du zero text. When a particular verse or part of a verse not in the document, and there is no logical explanation as haplography for exhaust it can not be given, site du zero it must be accepted that it is not in the parent document has come . When it is found that all the documents before a certain date a particular verse in it, while many documents of a later date have such a verse is, with reasonable certainty that this verse later inserted. A case in point is the fact that only a single handwritten manuscript of the Greek New Testament, minuscule 629 (aside Greek, Latin on the facing page) of time between 1300 to 1400 the first part of Hand.9: 6. ("It is hard for thee to kick the pricks.") The same manuscript, not in the Latin. site du zero It is included in the printed Greek editions of Erasmus. Hence, in most older translations of the time after the Reformation ended. It is clear that these words Luke in Acts 9 wrote, but in Hand.26: 14. Hence the copier miniscule manuscript of 629 in Acts 9 carried. We discuss this in more detail later text.
What a wonderful privilege in modern times in which we live all the variations over the years in copying or printing of the Bible originated, can be studied. It helps us to get closer site du zero to the exact words that come to God for letting us write it!
About Herman or bibledifferences.net site du zero The Reasons for the differences between older Bibles like the King James Version and newer Bibles like the New International Version have fascinated me ever since my studies in Theology at the University of Pretoria. I have great respect for Bible translators, so there must be good Reasons for the differences. With more than 5,600 Greek Manuscripts and more than 19,000 Manuscripts of ancient translations to our Disposal, The Original Autographs of the New Testament Can Be Established site du zero without doubt. I Investigate the Reasons behind the differences and publish the facts in a post on my blog www.bibledifferences.net to enable my readers to judge for eis. Personally I love to make an informed site du zero decision based of facts. That is why I Endeavor to Provide That privilege context to the readers of my blog. Since 1973 I am married to my dear wife and greatest site du zero friend, Leah Page, founder director of Act-Up site du zero Support (actup.co.za) site du zero a prayer ministry for families struggling with drug, and other occult-dependencies. We are blessed with two daughters and two sons, three grand sunset and one grand daughter. God is alive and omnipotent! Glory to His Name! Herman Grobler.
Website
New Publications 90 Was Jesus born holy, or holy called? Luke 1: 35 89 Capital letters or not? 88 Who hindered you from the truth obey? 87 Take up your cross. Mark 10:21 86 "born again" or "born from above" John. 3:3
Sow with the expectation of a rich harvest. Thank you

No comments:

Post a Comment